John Pearse 200L Bronze

Til dato tror jeg aldrig, jeg har oplevet min guitar lyde så godt med et par spritnye strenge, og de holder deres tone meget godt, men kun i starten, da selvom jeg er meget omhyggelig med rengøring af både hænder og strenge før og efter jeg spiller, har jeg lagt mærke til at de simpelthen dulmer gevaldigt ned i deres “varme” efter en måneds tid, hvilket nu også giver meget god mening, da de er 80/20.

Derimod, kan jeg kun anbefale dem, bare vær forberedt på at skulle købe mere end 1 sæt hvis det bliver din go too

I got these strings for a wonderful Furch Vintage 2 OM. I didn't want the characteristic tone of phosphor bronze with all it's shimmering harmonic content on this particular guitar so I tried a couple of different 80/20 strings for a more "old school" 60s kind of tone. Phosphor bronze strings actually didn't exist until the 70s so they're not really suitable for anyone looking for a 60s kind of vibe. For the tone I wanted with this guitar 80/20 "bronze" seemed like the way to go. Actually, 80/20 strings aren't really bronze at all, even though they are usually referred to as such. 80/20 strings are in fact brass.

I had previously tried the John Pearse 600L phosphor bronze strings on several guitars after reading much praise on various guitar forums. I didn't like them at all, they somehow felt like the guitar was always SHOUTING. They felt stiff and unresponsive unless I played really hard. They were also too bright and edgy for my taste.

After this disappointing experience my expectations weren't high but I wanted to test a couple of different 80/20-strings as I have previously had very little personal experience with this type of strings. The John Pearse 200L set turned out to be my favourite. On a different guitar I might have preferred other strings. You never really know until you try.

80/20 strings are usually referred to as brighter than phosphor bronze but that's really just when they're brand new. 80/20 strings usually mellow out relatively fast (unless you get coated strings of course...). The tone gets far more "organic" and with more focus on the fundamentals than the shimmering wall of overtones you get from phosphor bronze. These John Pearse strings mellowed out faster than most. Whether this is a good thing will of course depend on what kind of tone you're looking for. I'm sure some people will complain and say they go "dead" too fast.

If you like the organic, focused tone of broken in 80/20 strings you will probably love this set from John Pearse. If you want 80/20 strings that retain their new, bright sound for long you should probably look elsewhere. And of course, if you prefer the shimmering overtones of phoshor bronze you shouldn't even consider 80/20 at all.

These are the best strings I have tried to date. I used Gibson Masterbuilt but they have stopped making them now so I had to look for something else. I'm glad I did. I use these on my J45 and J35, and also on my Yamaha LL11E and they sound brilliant on all three guitars, and play really well. I will try them on the HD28 when I've run out of Martin Strings. I can't really fault the John Pearse strings. I always use Bronze strings, not phosphor Bronze - they just sound a little more earthy which is the sound I prefer from an acoustic guitar. I play mainly fingerstyle with nails and the strings are excellent for this - but they do sound really good with a plectrum too. One thing I was afraid of when I stopped using the Gibson strings was a metallic sound on the top three strings and of all the sets I tried, the John Pearse strings were the best and the least metallic, even from new. They last a decent length of time too - I've only just started using them in the last two or three months but I am still on my first sets! They're definitely worth trying out.